Buy a subscription

Home Contact Sitemap login Checkout

Farming Smarter

Farming Smarter
  • Home
  • Who We Are
    • Who We Are
    • Staff Directory
    • Board of Directors
    • Contact Us
  • What We Do
    • What We Do
    • Agronomy Research
    • Custom Research
    • Field Tested
    • Knowledge & Network
  • What We Offer
    • What We Offer
    • Events
      • Events
      • Farmers Learning Series
      • Agronomist Learning Series
    • Research Projects
      • Research Projects
      • Agronomy Research Projects
      • Field Tested Projects
      • Custom Research Projects
    • Subscriptions
      • Subscriptions
      • FS Agronomy Subscription
      • FS Digital Subscription
    • Sponsorship Opportunities
    • Smart Partner Program
    • Speakers
  • Get Involved
    • Get Involved
    • Sponsorship
    • I want to help!
    • With On-farm Research
    • With Product Testing
    • With Small Plot Research
    • Jobs
    • Internship Opportunities
    • Volunteer!
    • Support Research!
  • Learning Resources
    • Learning Resources
    • Online Classroom (CEU)
    • News Articles
    • Videos
    • Magazine
    • Publications & Reports
      • Publications & Reports
      • Published Papers
      • Research Reports
    • Podcasts
    • 360 Videos
Print This Page

Alfalfa Desiccation Timing Trials

Alfalfa Desiccation Timing Trials

Evaluate the possibility of widening the desiccation window by 1-2 weeks earlier without impacting harvestability or grain quality (dockage and/or germination).

Project Abstract

Alfalfa seed production crops have a long growing season often harvested in Late September to early October when the weather is cooler with frost and possibility of snow or other inclement weather. 

Desiccation occurs within 7 days of application to prevent pod shattering. As a result of later harvest, desiccation can be slowed and/or less affective due to cooler weather and less intense sunshine. Therefore, desiccating seed alfalfa earlier may improve desiccation efficacy and lower the risk of inclement weather interrupting harvest activities.

The goal is to evaluate the possibility of widening the desiccation window by 1-2 weeks earlier without impacting harvestability or grain quality (dockage and/or germination). Farming Smarter applied Reglone Ion and Acetic acid, both with Li700, when the alfalfa seed crop was mature. Reglone was applied (unintentionally) at 4x rate and acidic acid at 20% v/v using 160 L/acre water volume. Reglone showed greater dry down ability than Acetic acid (20%), and late Acetic acid (20%) dried the crop more than early and standard Acetic acid (20%). No differences in yield or harvestability were observed.


Image 1: General spraying picture of Custom Research Crew, June 14, 2021.

Project Details

Timeline 2022-2025
Principal Investigator: Ken Coles 
Farming Smarter
Project Contact: Trevor Deering
Funded By:

Alfalfa Seed Commission (100%)



Project Objectives

Trailor Icon To evaluate 3 desiccation timings using Reglone and Acetic acid, by assessing the effects on desiccation efficacy, seed germination, harvestability, and yield to understand the limits of the desiccation timing window.

Methods

Collaborators or Locations

Factorial trial design with 2 factors (chemical & timing) with complete randomization. Small plots with 4 replicates at 2 locations, Lethbridge County northwest of Coaldale AB and County of Newell just south of Rosemary AB.


Desiccation timing was carried out by Farming Smarter approximately 1 week before crops were fully mature (early timing), at maturity (standard timing) and approximately 1 week after full maturity (late timing). Each trial was sprayed at either dawn or dusk before so the chemicals would be absorbed into the leaves of the Alfalfa before the sun could activate them or evaporate the water on the leaf surface (making them less affective). Each trial was designed with 2.5-meter by 6-meter plots, leaving a small buffer between each plot in each block. A randomized complete block design was used with 4 blocks (replications).

Each block included each herbicide treatment (Fig. 1). A water volume of 160 L/acre was sprayed with a 2 m handheld CO2 propelled sprayer. Table 1 outlines the trial activity timeline. A visual efficacy rating was conducted on a scale of 0-100%, where 0 would be healthy plants not affected by the chemical and 100 would be brown, completed dried down plants due to the chemical. Photographs of each plot were taken right before harvest. The pictures were run through the EasyLeaf program to detect green plant material, referred to as greenness, and evaluate the efficacy of the treatments. Weights were collected for each plot, dockage weighed, and a corrected yield was calculated. A linear model with ANOVA statistics, using 95% confidence, were used to assess differences between the treatments.

Table 1: Research Activities Timing
Activity
Early Dates Standard Dates Late Dates
Application Timing Lethbridge Sept. 13 Sept. 24 Oct. 4
Application Timing Rosemary Aug. 27 Sept. 7 Sept. 21
Harvest Lethbridge Oct. 4 Oct. 4 Oct. 15
Harvest Rosemary Sept. 18 Sept 18. Sept. 27

Treatments

Trailor Icon Untreated Check
Trailor Icon Reglone Ion Early
Trailor Icon Reglone Ion Mid
Trailor Icon

Reglone Ion Late

Trailor Icon

Acetic Acid Early

Trailor Icon

Acetic Acid Mid

Trailor Icon

Acetic Acid Late

Note: Reglone Ion rate ≥ 160 L/acre water volume and 5.24 L/acre (unintended 4x rate); Acetic Acid ≥ 160 L/acre water volume and 20% concentration.


Figure 1: Trial diagram for Lethbridge field, illustrating the design methods of each trial.


Measurements

  • Photos of each plot
  • Efficacy rating - once before harvest
  • Yield

Results

Sign in or subscribe to view.

Farming Smarter

211034 Hwy 512, Lethbridge County, AB
T1J 5N9 Canada

Quick Links

Who We Are

What We Do

What We Offer

Get Involved

Learning Resources

More

Staff Directory

Contact

Copyright © Farming Smarter 2023. All rights reserved | Privacy Policy | Terms & Conditions